Knowledge Management in Innate Humanities from Minute Sciences to Interpretive Human Sciences

Document Type : Essay

Author

Imam Sadiq University (A.s)

Abstract

In the period it was assumed that the exact sciences are convincing and radical because of their precision - in the nineteenth century - and the use of inductive methods and the possibility of mathematics, and the humanities, on the other hand, are unconvinced because of the lack of such advantages. In the face of this erroneous assumption, the development of the "philosophy of the social sciences" sought to show the distinct innate of the humanities. In addition, with the field of some thinkers such as Weber and Delta, the humanities became particularly important; the fruit of these people's efforts led to the establishment of a school of interpretation; here is a brief overview of the idea of a school of interpretation.
It is tried in the exact sciences by recognizing the relations of "cause and effect" to analyze, explain and predict natural phenomena, but the phenomena of the humanities are fundamentally different from those of the exact sciences; because the phenomena of exact sciences are reproducible phenomena that can be modelled using laboratory facilities and have a high coefficient of accuracy. While the phenomena of the humanities are absolutely not conquered and they do not completely diminish in fixed models so that we can have a good forecast of their future with high accuracy. These phenomena are usually unique and do not have the exact same repetition; the root of this can be considered in the will of human beings. It is generally assumed that the natural world works with known stimuli and responses, but in the human world, stimuli can have very different responses; therefore, in the humanities, we will encounter active and independent actors and humanities thinkers study the actions of human beings.